Pz.Kpfw.I Ausf.A

Discussion in 'Kit Announcements' started by kampfflieger, Jan 18, 2007.

  1. kampfflieger

    kampfflieger Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Messages:
    424
    Likes Received:
    0
    May be. Problem in small inner parts as you understand. If Flakpanzer I will looks good I'll make more self-propelled guns.
  2. kampfflieger

    kampfflieger Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Messages:
    424
    Likes Received:
    0
    May be. Problem in small inner parts as you understand. If Flakpanzer I will looks good I'll make more self-propelled guns.
  3. kampfflieger

    kampfflieger Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Messages:
    424
    Likes Received:
    0
    May be. Problem in small inner parts as you understand. If Flakpanzer I will looks good I'll make more self-propelled guns.
  4. kampfflieger

    kampfflieger Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Messages:
    424
    Likes Received:
    0
    May be. Problem in small inner parts as you understand. If Flakpanzer I will looks good I'll make more self-propelled guns.
  5. charliec

    charliec Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Messages:
    887
    Likes Received:
    0
    Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top.

    The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech 47mm guns - it was ineffective because the gun wasn't powerful enough (image below).

    Regards,

    Charlie

    Attached Files:

  6. charliec

    charliec Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Messages:
    887
    Likes Received:
    0
    Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top.

    The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech 47mm guns - it was ineffective because the gun wasn't powerful enough (image below).

    Regards,

    Charlie
  7. charliec

    charliec Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Messages:
    887
    Likes Received:
    0
    Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top.

    The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech 47mm guns - it was ineffective because the gun wasn't powerful enough (image below).

    Regards,

    Charlie
  8. charliec

    charliec Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Messages:
    887
    Likes Received:
    0
    Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top.

    The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech 47mm guns - it was ineffective because the gun wasn't powerful enough (image below).

    Regards,

    Charlie
  9. charliec

    charliec Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Messages:
    887
    Likes Received:
    0
    Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top.

    The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech 47mm guns - it was ineffective because the gun wasn't powerful enough (image below).

    Regards,

    Charlie
  10. charliec

    charliec Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Messages:
    887
    Likes Received:
    0
    Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top.

    The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech 47mm guns - it was ineffective because the gun wasn't powerful enough (image below).

    Regards,

    Charlie
  11. charliec

    charliec Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Messages:
    887
    Likes Received:
    0
    Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top.

    The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech 47mm guns - it was ineffective because the gun wasn't powerful enough (image below).

    Regards,

    Charlie
  12. charliec

    charliec Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Messages:
    887
    Likes Received:
    0
    Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top.

    The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech 47mm guns - it was ineffective because the gun wasn't powerful enough (image below).

    Regards,

    Charlie
  13. charliec

    charliec Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Messages:
    887
    Likes Received:
    0
    Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top.

    The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech 47mm guns - it was ineffective because the gun wasn't powerful enough (image below).

    Regards,

    Charlie
  14. charliec

    charliec Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Messages:
    887
    Likes Received:
    0
    Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top.

    The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech 47mm guns - it was ineffective because the gun wasn't powerful enough (image below).

    Regards,

    Charlie
  15. charliec

    charliec Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Messages:
    887
    Likes Received:
    0
    Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top.

    The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech 47mm guns - it was ineffective because the gun wasn't powerful enough (image below).

    Regards,

    Charlie
  16. charliec

    charliec Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Messages:
    887
    Likes Received:
    0
    Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top.

    The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech 47mm guns - it was ineffective because the gun wasn't powerful enough (image below).

    Regards,

    Charlie
  17. charliec

    charliec Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Messages:
    887
    Likes Received:
    0
    Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top.

    The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech 47mm guns - it was ineffective because the gun wasn't powerful enough (image below).

    Regards,

    Charlie
  18. Krzychu74

    Krzychu74 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello!
    charliec: Of course you right. I wrote wrong. I should write: And what do you think about Panzerjäger 1 or Sturmpanzer I. Then all would be clear, because I had on thought both vehicles.
    Thank You for Your note.

    Best regards.
    Krzychu
  19. Krzychu74

    Krzychu74 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello!
    charliec: Of course you right. I wrote wrong. I should write: And what do you think about Panzerjäger 1 or Sturmpanzer I. Then all would be clear, because I had on thought both vehicles.
    Thank You for Your note.

    Best regards.
    Krzychu
  20. Krzychu74

    Krzychu74 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello!
    charliec: Of course you right. I wrote wrong. I should write: And what do you think about Panzerjäger 1 or Sturmpanzer I. Then all would be clear, because I had on thought both vehicles.
    Thank You for Your note.

    Best regards.
    Krzychu