list of 6 Axle diesel on 18" radius

MilesWestern

Active Member
Sep 20, 2005
1,800
0
36
34
CA
protopaintwest.googlepages.com
Most locomotives are designed to handle 18" radius curves, but none, with the exeption of a few industrial switchers, look good doing so. The Athearn Big Boy was designed to handle those curves, even though it'd NEVER happen in real life. The list for locomotives than CANNOT would be a shorter one.

Don't mean to burst your bubble if I did! :cry: :eek:ops:
 

Russ Bellinis

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
4,501
0
36
78
Lakewood, Ca.
Visit site
I had an Athearn sd45 that would go around a 15 inch radius, but the coupler hung so far off the side of the tracks that a box car hooked to it went up on the outside wheels ( I was going to say 2 wheels, but it was actually 4 wheels) around the corner and then dropped back down on all 8 wheels! The point is that even if a locomotive will go around a particular radius does not mean it can haul anything else around that radius.
 

LongIslandTom

Member
Apr 8, 2006
662
0
16
Long Island, NY
Report on the 6-axle locos that I do own:

Athearn blue-box SD40-2 - will have trouble staying on the rails going around 18" radius snap track, but will negotiate superelevated flex-track 18" curves as long as there are no kinks in the track joints.

Athearn blue-box SD40T-2 - This unit is substantially longer than the plain SD40-2, and it won't go around 18" radius of ANY kind. There simply isn't enough truck swivel, and wheels will simply pop off the tracks.

Athearn blue-box FP45 - Same problem as the SD40T-2. Very long body, insufficient truck swivel. Won't go around 18" radius of ANY kind.

Athearn blue-box F45 - This unit is actually a bit shorter than an SD40-2, and it will go around 18"-radius snap track without derailing, but just.

I think the rule of thumb is that if a particular 6-axle loco is shorter than an SD40-2, it probably will go around 18" curves. Any longer than that, probably not a good idea.
 

pgandw

Active Member
Jul 9, 2005
1,002
0
36
wickman said:
Can we do this for steam engines too?:wave: we don't want them feeling left out.

My rule of thumb for steam on 18" radius curves is that if it won't fit on a 10" turntable, it's too big, and will look horrible on the curves. Also, engine to tender separation will have to be huge.

That said, almost all HO steam models (except brass) with 8 drivers or less (x-8-x), will go around 18" radius curves. With 10 drivers (2-10-0, 2-10-2), only the smaller Decapods are going to make it.

Almost all HO non-brass articulateds will go around 18" radius curves, but will look horrible doing so.

Again, my rule is nothing bigger than a 2-8-0 on 18" radius. Any modern (post 1910) steam power with trailing trucks (4-6-2, 2-8-2, and up) should have bigger curves. The smaller engines look much better with the short trains of 40ft freight cars that are most appropriate for 18" curves.

my thoughts, your choices
 

LongIslandTom

Member
Apr 8, 2006
662
0
16
Long Island, NY
My report on the steam engines I own or worked with, as per Wickman's wishes: :D

Thomas the Tank Engine - I bought this as a birthday present for my little 5-yr. old nephew. Will work on 18" radius track no problems at all whatsoever. :thumb: sign1

MDC Roundhouse Old-Time 2-8-0 Consolidation - I just purchased this one a few days ago to be given as a gift for my brother-in-law this Christmas. It has slop on the drivers wheels and will negotiate 18"-radius track no problems. The LED headlight on this puppy is BRIGHT...

Broadway Limited Imports 4-6-4 J1e NYC Hudson with Quantum sound and DCC: No problems going around 18" radius curves whatsoever. This is the first steam engine I've ever purchased and I love it to death, considering that it only cost me $129.
 

Triplex

Active Member
Aug 24, 2005
1,719
0
36
38
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Athearn blue-box F45 This unit is actually a bit shorter than an SD40-2, and it will go around 18"-radius snap track without derailing, but just.

I think the rule of thumb is that if a particular 6-axle loco is shorter than an SD40-2, it probably will go around 18" curves. Any longer than that, probably not a good idea.
In real life, SD40s and SD45s are about 3' shorter than SD40-2s and SD45-2s. F45s are about the same length as the pre-Dash-2 SDs.
 

LongIslandTom

Member
Apr 8, 2006
662
0
16
Long Island, NY
Yep. The F45 works out to be a little over a third of an inch shorter (10.5mm) than the SD40-2 in HO (wheelbase-wise anyway).. So I think the pre-Dash-2 engines like the Athearn SD40, SD38, Kato SD45 should be able to go around 18" track. :thumb:

Pilot overhang/coupling issues still apply though of course..
 

Triplex

Active Member
Aug 24, 2005
1,719
0
36
38
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
And, of course, SD7s, SD9s, SD24s and SD35s are shorter than SD38s, SD40s and SD45s. However, there are no short 6-axle U-boats or Centuries. I think this is at least partly because they always put the dynamic brake section ahead of the prime mover instead of above it, while EMD only started doing that with the SD50.
 

LongIslandTom

Member
Apr 8, 2006
662
0
16
Long Island, NY
Heya Alexander,

You can probably enlarge the opening in the frame where the trucks sit to allow them greater swivel (you don't have grind the tank, actually)..

But then you will run into other issues-- The driveshaft and universal joints, when spinning, tends to exert forces on the truck to force it to straighten. Also, the trucks might bump into things on the shell like jacking pads that prevents them from swiveling any further. So those are a few potential issues you may have to deal with as well in addition to the frame clearance.

Anyway, these days my 6-axle locos don't get much use... 4-axle power work much better on my tiny layout with its 18" curves, so these days the vast majority of the locos on my layout are 4-axlers... Geeps, GE Dash-8 B's, Geeps, U-boat-B's, Geeps, Alco S-series switchers, Geeps, EMD SWs, Geeps, Amtrak F40s and Gennies, and that's right, more Geeps. Did I mention Geeps? sign1
 

green_elite_cab

Keep It Moving!
Apr 4, 2005
1,876
0
36
34
Hainesport NJ
6 axle locmotives that o won and run on 18" track with no operational problems:

Spectrum SD45
Atlas U34CH
Athearn SD75M, AC4400CW, C44-9W
P2K SD7

the Athearn ones do look a little ugly on 18 inch radius, but the others can run just fine on them and look right.
 

green_elite_cab

Keep It Moving!
Apr 4, 2005
1,876
0
36
34
Hainesport NJ
Triplex said:
And, of course, SD7s, SD9s, SD24s and SD35s are shorter than SD38s, SD40s and SD45s. However, there are no short 6-axle U-boats or Centuries. I think this is at least partly because they always put the dynamic brake section ahead of the prime mover instead of above it, while EMD only started doing that with the SD50.


the U36C is more or less the length of the SD45.
 
LongIslandTom said:
Heya Alexander,

You can probably enlarge the opening in the frame where the trucks sit to allow them greater swivel (you don't have grind the tank, actually)..

But then you will run into other issues-- The driveshaft and universal joints, when spinning, tends to exert forces on the truck to force it to straighten. Also, the trucks might bump into things on the shell like jacking pads that prevents them from swiveling any further. So those are a few potential issues you may have to deal with as well in addition to the frame clearance.

Anyway, these days my 6-axle locos don't get much use... 4-axle power work much better on my tiny layout with its 18" curves, so these days the vast majority of the locos on my layout are 4-axlers... Geeps, GE Dash-8 B's, Geeps, U-boat-B's, Geeps, Alco S-series switchers, Geeps, EMD SWs, Geeps, Amtrak F40s and Gennies, and that's right, more Geeps. Did I mention Geeps? sign1

ahhhhhh, lot'a geeps. Actually (aside from a rarely used Tyco) i dont roster any geeps. i'll have to get a GP9. maybe a UP one, or a Great Northern. plus another SD24. thats all thats on my motive power roster for now