Feedback for New Layout -CN & CBCNS

Agatheron

Member
Nov 8, 2003
317
0
16
54
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Visit site
I know I have posted a couple layout design possibilities here before, but since I now know my benchwork, I decided to call in a bit of help. Siderod did this design for two reasons... 1. He's more experienced at this sort of thing that I am, but secondly he happens to live in the area that I want to model.

Born and raised in Western Canada, my roots are in the Maritimes (Atlantic Canada). I have been collecting Canadian National Locomotives for a little while, but I was also struck by the paint scheme of the Cape Breton and Central Nova Scotia Railway. It seemed then a blend of the two seemed appropriate, so the best place to model this would be the Truro area of Nova Scotia, which serves as the junction between the mainline and shortline.

Here's a pic of what Andrew did for me:
AgatheronLayoutIntegrated.jpg


The faint parts are the lower-deck staging areas...

Anyway, here's Andrew's description of how this might be operated:
Hey Guys,

John and I have been talking through the forum and over MSN Messenger about layout options for the past several months. This design hit close to home for me, as John is a canuck also, and has decided that he wants to model the Truro, NS area, where the Cape Breton & Central Nova Scotia (CBCNS) interchanges with the Canadian National (CN) Railway. He didn't have a huge amount of space, but had some big ideas. After i talked him out of scaling back his ideas a bit (i like a challenge Laughing ), we decided on how much space was going to be given, which was restricted to a point, as John was going to use shelving units from Ikea. Once the best design had been established, John let me get to work...and a couple late nights later, the result is forum-worthy.

Okay...now, i know some here will be quick to point out that there are some steep grades (a couple feet of 4%, etc), as well as some s-curves and things of that nature. To anyone who feels that way, i'm going to say that, while truro doesn't have the grades near-by (ruling on the Bedford Sub [East of Truro] is around 1.8%, ruling on the Springhill Sub [West of Truro] is 2%), it does have a lot of curves. And, since the Truro area isn't governed under CTC/RTC control, it's OCS-limitations and track speed is, IIRC, 10Mph. I don't have any of my up-to-date CN Timetables handy to check. That said, John knows that he won't be able to haul 100-car trains up that grade, and won't be able to run at Mach 6.39 around those corners, and he's OK with it, because the prototype doesn't do it.

Looking at the upper level, the Wye on the left is the Truro Wye. Just left of that, the line curves around to the bottom of the layout. In that area, the Truro station would normally reside. The three spurs off on the right-most edge of the left side of the layout are in Brookfield. The single spur is Brookfield Lumber, and the longer lead into the other two spurs is down into the LaFarge Cement Plant. Next, the line passes over a bridge. I'm calling this the Shube-River Bridge, in Shubenacadie. The line next comes to a trailing-point spur. This is going to be National Gypsum's Milford Loading facility. In real life, there is a Wye there, as it's the ending and turning point for the Bedford's 700-series trains. However, i didn't feel it was necessary to add, and decided to just make it a trailing point, to make it feel like it went somewhere...perfect spot to spot a couple hoppers waiting to be loaded. After that switch, the line disappears into a tunnel. There are no tunnels on the Bedford, but this is modelers license. Under the back of the layout is going to be a 5-track staging yard, double ended, representing both points West of Truro and East of Milford. Specifically, Moncton and Halifax.

If we go back to the wye in Truro, and move right towards the yard, thats the A-Yard in Truro...the yard that CN and CBCNS share, where an interchange takes place. The real yard is a tad more complex, but also a fair bit longer. This is a fair scaled down representation. After leaving the yard, the CBCNS mainline climbs through a 3% grade (There are points on the CBCNS line that are near 3% in places), until it gets to the Stellarton Yard, passing one spur along the way. Stellarton yard, in this model, is reversed from the way it is on the prototype, but this is the only way i could get the wye to fit in and still function properly.

Only two trains make it from Stellarton to Truro on CBCNS....305 and 306, the interchange trains with CN's 307 and 308. CN and VIA, however, have more trains through Truro on a given day. VIA #14 and #15 both make stops in Truro, usually within an hour of each other (#15 westbound, #14 eastbound). CN 120, 121, 148 and 149 are all Hi-Pri trains, two westbound and two eastbound. CN 308 and 307, as mentioned earlier, interchange with CBCNS. Again, one eastbound and one westbound. There are also some local jobs that go and switch the cement plant and lumber spur.

One could be kept VERY busy on this layout...and i think it would be great for more then one person. Looking at it quickly, i can see a way to keep at least 4 operators busy working.

So, lets hear it...comments and suggestions. I know this area rather well, and built the layout as best one could given the space restrictions. However, i am open to suggestions and comments about what you guys think...would you like to own this layout? Or operate on it?

Later
AR

Anyway, I wouldn't mind some feedback on this... After all, it is based on a prototype... the layout itself is roughly 5'x12'

John
 

GeorgeHO

Member
May 3, 2005
170
0
16
Baltimore, MD
Is the hidden staging area reachable, or is it used just to hold trains that disappear for a whilte then reappear the next day coming from a different direction? How much room is there between levels?
 

Agatheron

Member
Nov 8, 2003
317
0
16
54
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Visit site
I'm looking at possibly doing some lift-out sections to access the staging area... or having it accessible via the back by pulling the layout away from the wall in case of a major underground derailment. There's not a great deal of clearance between the A-Yard in truro (on the left hand side) and the track below it. There's at least one (short) 4% grade on the left hand side coming out of the staging yard at the back... My hope is to lower the staging yard base and to have the upper deck mounted on some fairly thin MDF board. It should give a full interior clearance of about 2-3 inches.

The track will be Kato Unitrack as well, which as I hope means that the track itself back there will be pretty bulletproof...
 

MasonJar

It's not rocket surgery
Oct 31, 2002
5,362
0
36
Ottawa, Canada
Visit site
A few thoughts...

- What is the separation between the upper and lower decks? I don't think that a liftout will help you access the staging, as a liftout of (part of) the yard would be impractical, and it is a bit of a reach to the other end over the lake. You probably are better to ensure you can get at the staging directly.

- Do you have any more room available? Could you pull the layout forward, and put the staging behind a scenic divider? It would be harder to reach perhaps, but then you could eliminate or minimize the grade.

- Despite what the prototype does with its 2% grade and twisty track, it does not begin to approach what the modeller must compromise on. Even tight prototype curves scale out to 10+ foot radii...! That particular combination of 4% grade plus what looks like an 18" radius will severely limit what your model locos can do.

- I would extend the A-yard tracks by moving the initial turnout on the "south side" further towards the bottom left. The shortest tracks look like they have only a 1-2 car capacity.

Overall it looks good. I like the basis in reality, and the combination of industries sounds like it will be great to operate.

Andrew
 

MasonJar

It's not rocket surgery
Oct 31, 2002
5,362
0
36
Ottawa, Canada
Visit site
Well, 4% is 4% regardless of scale, but the separation needed may be reduced (but you still have to get your hand in there in case of derailment). The slope/curve combination will still be difficult for your locos. Is there any way to eliminate it (either as I have suggested, or some other way)?

My comment about the yard being longer could still apply, but obviously the capacity is more than I stated (when I was assuming HO).

Andrew
 
Okay, Hands up...how many here have been to Truro? How many remember the exact trackplan?

I'm the one that designed the layout for John, so i figured i'd step in and field some of the questions. John is using prebuilt shelving, and even getting this much space took some convincing with the wife, so i doubt any extra space would be doable.

On another note, the prototype doesn't have any 2% grades on either of the subdivisions modeled. Some grades come close (As mentioned earlier), but neither of those grades are represented on the layout. The only reason the layout is graded at all is because that was the only way i could get CN and CBCNS on without compromising more then i already did.

Truro has some realllyyy sharp curves. Sure, in N-scale, they'd be dozens of feet radius, but honestly, how many of us have room for them? One thing that bugs me is when someone says "Well, that curve is way sharper then the prototype...". Of course it is...every curve on every layout is sharper then the prototype. CN has sharp curves in the Truro area, so i used "sharp" (11" with 12" easements) model curves to represent it. If the mainline had a HUGE curve, i would have used larger curves.

The grade is going to be a pain, and ideally, i would have liked to avoid it, but it seems like the only way to get what John wanted in the plan and still maintain at least partial runability. Since all trains through Truro are goin realllyyy slowly, a slow hard pull up that hill wouldn't be that bad.

As for the comment on the A-Yard, it's laid out that way in the real yard, and moving the turnout would have eliminated the switching lead, which is a mile or more in the real A-Yard. Since there are few other industries on the layout, a switching lead was something i felt was a must.

AR
 

Agatheron

Member
Nov 8, 2003
317
0
16
54
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Visit site
Here's a diagram of how the shelving should come together:

BenchworkTry4.jpg


I am planning to use Ikea's GORM shelving units, which screw and bolt together, as opposed to the IVAR units which are primarily held together by gravity: The larger Green blocks are shelving units that are 51cm (20") deep by 77cm (30.3") wide. The overall height of the benchwork will be a 110cm (43") tall base. The corner unit covers a 77x77cm footprint... the red coloured shelves are 31cm(12.2")x77cm(30.3"). As you can see, the blue areas are where I "cut" the corners a bit.

As always, any plan can change once it starts being implemented. Andrew is right in that the trains through Truro are kept at very low speeds, so I'm not moving things too quickly through the layout. However, I will be doing a fair bit of test fitting once I get the benchwork built up and ready to go. :) I'll be sure to post progress shots, but I may not get to that stage until late may/early June. I should also note, the 4% grade that's on this layout is situated at the back of the layout, and will be hidden by a cut in the terrain. I'm not so worried about appearances...
 

MasonJar

It's not rocket surgery
Oct 31, 2002
5,362
0
36
Ottawa, Canada
Visit site
John, Andrew,

My comment about the grade/curve combination was not about whether it was the scale equivalent to Truro (a comparison invited by John's comments about how twisty/steep the prototype is/was) but rather what your MODEL locomotives can handle.

I am just pointing out that if you expect to haul more than a few cars out of staging (as implied by the length of the tracks) up that 4% grade, you might be disappointed. If you are happy running double headers, helpers, or only moving a few cars at a time, then please ignore my comments(s).

As Fred (pgandw) says... My thoughts, your choices.

Andrew
 

grumbeast

Member
Jan 13, 2003
455
0
16
55
Dartmouth, N.S. Canada
www.accesswave.ca
John, Andrew (siderod)

I work in Truro and the main runs behind my workplace (as does the line to the little industrial park). If you need any specific info I can try and help. I have quite a few photo's taken around the Truro area on my website (grumbeast.fotopic.net)

As for some of the curves / grades, there is some pretty messed up track here (esp in the industrial park) train 501 (I think) switches a few industries there (the Co-op feedmill, intertape polmer and a propane facility to name a few) generally a short job (2 - 8 cars + caboose .. perfect for a model) and some of the grades a scarey, but it would just be for a few cars.

Hope this helps, any questions please ask, hell I should model Truro myself, its a great size for a medium sized layout

Graham
 

Agatheron

Member
Nov 8, 2003
317
0
16
54
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Visit site
Masonjar... I appreciate your comments, and your caution will certainly come into play. Fortunately, since this is my first layout, I am building it with Kato Unitrack, so I can set up and take down different combinations before committing myself to something I have to glue or nail down before I can run trains over it...

My plan is to build up the benchwork and start laying things down... however, there is a small possibility that I might be able to add a series of shelves across the back, which would give me a 31cm deep (about 12") staging yard that would be behind a backdrop. It would take care of the grade issue quite easily... I guess it's trying to arrange the use of real-estate with something I am comfortable with AND my wife is okay with... 12" can be very little, it could also be a lot :) The challenge is that I have a very odd-shaped townhouse with odd curves and no 90 degree angle walls where I can put stuff...

Grumbeast... got a camera on hand? I wouldn't mind seeing a few of those pics... The best I've been able to do is find some maps and such, but none of them are as potentially detailed as a satellite picture... 'cept Google Earth doesn't have a high-res picture of Truro :(
 

engineshop

Member
Apr 29, 2003
136
0
16
61
San Rafael, CA USA
www.engineshop.org
Andrew
I would change the A yard a little bit. Use left and right switches and you get more track out of it.
..........______________
......../______________
___/______________
........\__________
.......... \_________

(Disregard the little dots. I could not make it work without them)

Have you thought about the possibility to bring the hidden stagging yard to the front?
Same layout but after the West entrance to the hidden part you loop around to the front, and do the same thing on the right. It will also give you more distance to cover enought elevation.
 
engineshop said:
Andrew
I would change the A yard a little bit. Use left and right switches and you get more track out of it.

I would, but that wouldn't be realistic or prototypical. Some of what i've done on this layout isn't prototypical, but it represents the area well enough that anyone who even sees the layout and knows the Truro area could make the connection.

Thanks for the comments though!
AR