I have been searching for some small layout designs to fit my 8x12 space. I have mostly been looking through my old copies of MR from 1981-86 and looking online.
I came across a design I really like, and fits my overall desire for running with a little switching thrown in. It even depicts the same location I'm interested in.
The layout is the BL&T - Bogg's Landing & Trottwater featured in the June 2001 issue of Model Railroader. It was one of the winners of the small layout competitions.
Is anyone familiar with this design?
I will try to post a scan of the trackplan ASAP, but would like comments on any potential problem areas to watch out for - like the possible reach problem for a good portion of the layout (around 3 feet deep in some portions). How do the grades look? I plan to use spectrum 4-6-0 and 2-8-0's (HO scale).
Also, is anyone willing to convert this into xtrkcad or 3rd planit? I have both programs but can't seem to get beyond laying sectional track (both programs have horrible flex track interfaces). And this layout has three track elevations.
Lastly - any changes you think would improve this design?
Thanks everyone,
Greg
I came across a design I really like, and fits my overall desire for running with a little switching thrown in. It even depicts the same location I'm interested in.
The layout is the BL&T - Bogg's Landing & Trottwater featured in the June 2001 issue of Model Railroader. It was one of the winners of the small layout competitions.
Is anyone familiar with this design?
I will try to post a scan of the trackplan ASAP, but would like comments on any potential problem areas to watch out for - like the possible reach problem for a good portion of the layout (around 3 feet deep in some portions). How do the grades look? I plan to use spectrum 4-6-0 and 2-8-0's (HO scale).
Also, is anyone willing to convert this into xtrkcad or 3rd planit? I have both programs but can't seem to get beyond laying sectional track (both programs have horrible flex track interfaces). And this layout has three track elevations.
Lastly - any changes you think would improve this design?
Thanks everyone,
Greg