Just another Silly Question.......

N

N Gauger

1:20.3 Train Addict
Dec 20, 2000
6,732
0
36
South Eastern, PA
mywebpages.comcast.net
...That I can't answer off the top of my head...

A friend & I were driving along, when we spotted 3 deisels running along at about 50 MPH.

He asked "Hey, only the front engine has its lights on. Does that mean that is the only powered unit???" ----- "Oh I guess having only One unit powered out of 3 uses less fuel..."

I said " I have no bloody idea" :) :)

Well how about it?? Anyone know if you use more fuel "Towing with One unit" than if all 3 were powered????

I would figure on "3 powered" uses more fuel than "One towing 2" :) :) :)
 
That depends. Were the locos pulling any cars or were they running light? If they were light, I would only expect the front loco to be running while the others are shut down. If pulling cars, that will depend on how heavy the load is (and other factors). And yes, it's more fuel effecient to run one engine than all three. Also cuts down on the amount of maintenance that has to be done based on usage.

When you mention the lights, I assume you're talking about headlights and ditchlights. Only the lead locomotive has them on, to conserve electrical power (and fuel) and to reduce useage on the lights themselves. The only way you can really be sure a non-lead loco is running (aside from stopping the train and asking) is to look for smoke coming out of the exhaust pipe.
 
BDC -- Thanks!!! Yes youre powers of deduction are accurate.. :) there were Only 3 Locos. No cars.... And Yes again: The head & Ditch lights were the only things lit - Don't remember if the number boards were lit.


I guessed it right - it is worse to run all 3, than to Tow 2 -- Thanks!!

~~ Mikey
 
Just as kind of an aside, I don't recall ever seeing a multiple unit lash-up, running light or pulling cars, on which anything other than the lead unit had its lights on. That raises the question of why other units would use their lights?:confused: One question leads to another.
 
Rear Lights????

I would figure that they would, at least, have One rear light lit just for safety's sake... But this is, believe it or not, the first time I've "analyzed" Engines running light.. :)

I take too much stuff for granted.. :) :)

Comes from growing up Two blocks from the NE Corridor.. :)

~~ Mikey
 
DPU/Remote engines

UP and BN both run coal trains through NE Oklahoma. Generally they run with two engines leading, coal hoppers, and then one(UP) or two(BN) locomotives pushing on the end. The locos on the end have their headlights on dim - no ditch lights, red lights, or EOT device.
 
I can remember seeing and photographing a train of locomotives on Conrail that was called the Engine Changers. It used to run late on Saturdays or Sundays. It was train made up entirely of locomotives and sometimes a caboose. I saw it with as few as six units and as many as twelve. It was bizarre to see SD60’s GP40s, GP9s, and SW1001s all together. The train was used to change locomotives at the various yards in the Philadelphia area. I use to catch it on the Chester Secondary in Tinicum or Chester, or along the Northeast Corridor.
 
Carl is right on the money. I remember reading something about this in Trains magazine in the past couple of months. Under current regulations, an engine on the rear of a train is allowed to have its headlight (I believe dimmed) on as an EOT marker. As the rear engine has everything and more as far as sensing equipment, there is no reason for an EOT device. I see this a lot on BNSF trains running around in the Southwest, (especially in California) where DPUs are used on the rear. The last unit will have its headlight on, (whichever is pointing rearward).

Tom
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom