An issue of semantics...
Hey, Steve! Good to see you!

I guess you've already figured out where a lot of the guys from the Atlas forum went when it shut down.
trainsteve2435 said:
well, i dont guess its really a module, i just built it that way but it is a permanent layout that will easily come apart and re assemble.
Based on your conversations on the Atlas forum, it sounds like Steve's building a
sectional layout. As Fred stated,
modules are designed to be interchangeable, which I don't believe is a concern for Steve. He just wants something easy to disassemble when it's time to move. So, standard layout design rules apply; don't worry about conforming to any modular standards.
trainsteve2435 said:
so i guess i need to learn how to make nice "S" curves, any suggestions?
On your track plan, or in the real world? Use a compass (the kind for drawing circles, not the kind for determining direction

) on your track plan, and a trammel (long stick, like a yardstick, with holes drilled in it) to transfer the curves onto your benchwork for laying track. Drill a hole in your yardstick at the 1-inch mark, then other holes for the radii of your curves (don't forget to add an inch, since you're not starting from zero

). Stick the hole at one inch over a screw or nail at the center point of the curve, and a pencil in the hole for your radius, and draw your arc.
As
shaygetz stated, the
ideal situation is to have at least one car length of straight track between opposing curves. And IIRC, according to John Armstrong, the next best solution is to have them immediately adjacent to one another, and the worst situation is to have them separated by a short (20-40 scale feet) straight section.
Good luck with it, Steve. Let us know how things go.:thumb: