Thanks guys
there are 3 vids there now. just hit the "NEXT" button for the others. You can see them here:
http://s147.photobucket.com/albums/r310/nazgul-np/?action=view¤t=IMGP0646.flv
I did them on my digital camera because our camcorder was dropped and no longer works:cry: But the good news is...I didn't do it!

I won't do anymore until I get a new one.
I remember reading a little debate somewhere about whether or not modeling anything but still or extremely slow moving water would take away from the realism of a layout. Now, obviously in
still pics...it's not an issue, but in person and on video, it is a legitimate question (an an interesting one). I guess the gist of the argument was this: you're already asking the viewer of the layout to suspend a certain amount of disbelief already (size, distances, people and vehicles not moving... most of the time) and now you'd be adding moving water that is "frozen" in time. So, I guess it becomes a question of, where to draw the line.
My take is this: most of us will never have the type of layout (for various reasons) that will really ever make the viewer FORGET that he or she is looking at a model (no matter how well done it is)...I know I certainly don't! Seeing a well done waterfall or fast moving water doesn't take away anything from the experience and in still pictures it can actually be a huge plus. Having said that, in videos.......it doesn't work. In the video I did, where the river and waterfall are in plain view...it just looks "wrong" and really points out the fact that "this is all fake". That, I guess, is the real drawback. In person...not an issue (for me)...on video...not something I want to show. There are plenty of other parts of the layout to show on video but the water doesn't work.
If any one cares to share their opinion I would love to hear from you
take care:thumb: