A long time ago, when I used to make Destroyers of the U.S. Navy, I, being a machinist, always imagined the relative thickness of the parts I was putting together. This relativity is what turned me off to plastic models. I was also a Mold Maker, and knew the limitations of that process. When making the ship's bridges, and other certain sections, I realized that the catwalk guards had to be made out of normal paper stock. I would stiffen the back side with "Crazy Glue" so they would not warp, and make the railings out of thicker stock, on some models I would roll tubes. I used to paint my models a lot, so "Greebling" was the norm, as was color matching and paintings. This is where plastic ship models fall short, when everything is the same thickness, the models lose depth when scrutinized closely. People don't even know why they would say, "That looks so real", when looking at the paper models, most had no idea of what they were made of. I used everything and anything, so they were really multimedia models.. It's these small details, like cutting out the railings, and using string for them, again, I would dope these with a liquid hardener so they would not sag, though on many ship the wires really do sag a little. Just my two cents worth, and this was for larger scale models. For smaller scale, forgeddaboutit! When I moved on to sailboats, then accuracy became paramount, as I was actively sailing a real 10 meter boat for a few years, and the few people I made models for wanted accuracy, as many of these models where displayed in their homes. I didn't get really any money out of it, but being able to take out a $100,000 dollar sailboat a few times with just me and a girlfriend was payment enough. When it came to repairing boats, fiberglass damage/re-enforcement, changing starter motors/engines, rebuilding winches, etc. I whacked the sh*t out of them (for monetary gain, if you know what I mean

) .
