grandpacoyote said:Zedob & Russ,
Is this what you all had in mind? I think it is and see the benifit of it. Let me know what you all think, did I get it right?![]()
![]()
Peace.
That is about it. I think it would work better with the new crossover turned around, but it will work either way. If the space is too tight to fit the crossover the other way due to the switch leading to industry "B" there is no reason the switch for the upper track could not be installed just beyond the switch for the siding to "B" so that the crossover starts in the straight just before the curve in the lower track and completes beyond the switch in the upper section. I'm sorry, I just don't know enough about computers to draw my ideas, and post them.