I decide if the thread is derailed and it isn't. Nothing I said was false. I don't like corporations pulling at heart strings especially after taking Billions of tax dollars and paying them back with money they made from those same grants by buying government bonds at 0% and selling them at 4%. This is all a lie and deceit. Your opinion is just that, as is mine, just opinion. That was a commercial, Clint Eastwood is an actor. He was a paid actor for this spot, even if he is giving the money away, he still gets a tax deduction. Reality check here:
I found it necessary because if someone is going to make a post like this when it is self evident that there is a big problem in this country and this "commercial" offered nothing, made no illusions as who caused the problem, who "they" were, then it is going to be addressed, by me. That is my right, and I exercise it. Just like you were allowed too. You made the post and voiced your opinion.
Do not disparage those who do not agree with you, directly or otherwise.
I did not think it was a good commercial and I did not think it was justified.
If Clint, one of my favorite all time actors, did that one his own dime, different story, I would attack it for the other reasons it was off, however, being sponsored by Chrysler, it's a joke. It's misleading. It was a commercial, buy a Chrysler and put an American back to work. By a Chrysler, and send your money overseas. I'm sorry, but first, of I did NOT derail this thread, I voiced my opinion.
You can make a post, voice your opinion, but to state the purpose of the thread is your opinion, to state someone has violated is a NO GO!
Post an opinion about what I said, don't dare reprimand me for stating my opinion.
I personally am sick of Hollywood types making political statements. They are just actors. That commercial seemed to lay the blame at some other shores, when the problem was created by U.S..
Clint Eastwood was an avid opponent to the automobile bailouts. There would be no GM, no Chrysler, and Ford would have had to cease production because the infrastructure for automobile production would have ceased in this country. This has been stated by all foreign companies that produce cars in this country, i.e. Subaru,Honda,, Mercedes Benz, etc. Clint East, now a self described Libertarian,, says he has not changed his opinion. So why was he plugging a car that is owed 58% by Fiat Of course, Clint says he is not keeping any of the millions paid to him, I believe him. That gives pause to thought though, imagine being so wealthy, you can "not take Millions" owed you. I see a great disconnect there. American production was sold to the cheapest bidder, and you and I did not make a dime off of it, but we are paying for it. Enough with the "Feel Good" deceptions. How many people here have 401K's that will be large enough to retire on. How many people here have any type of retirement plan? It was just a football game that generated a massive amount of money paid to a relatively small group of people who don't give a damned about you or me. Again, just me expressing my opinion, with the right too..
For the month of November 2011
Year To Date
Deficit in Deficit in
Millions Millions
Country Name of U.S. $ of U.S. $
China -26,871.59 -272,321.34
Japan -6,207.18 -56,101.70
Mexico -5,514.12 -60,616.01
Germany -4,656.40 -44,436.23
Saudi Arabia -3,067.96 -30,059.36
Canada -2,976.63 -31,869.54
Ireland -2,808.65 -28,768.55
Russia -2,510.94 -24,202.22
Nigeria -2,307.35 -27,586.36
Venezuela -1,914.39 -28,855.80
Chrysler, Produced primarily in Mexico and Canada and assembled here.
If the next posts are disparaging anyone for their opinions, the thread will be locked. If you like the Clint Eastwood Video, great, say so, that's fine, aside from the realities of our present economic realities, I always like Clint, he is a great actor. If you wish to offer any opinion on the commercial spot, feel free to, even if it is contrary to anyone else's. No problem there.
