Fun thing to do...
Funny yet kind of frustrating how many RTR locomotives are not exact matches of a particular prototype; problem is worse for steam engines but it's there for diesels as well. Guess it's a boon for those who like to do a lot of extra painting and detailing, but I don't.
Looks like #6935 wasn't an OL engine, at least not when this picture was taken. Either it was repainted at another time or Athearn needs to put more time into prototype research.
Oops what happened to the C&NW logo on the nose?
Couldn't find #1212, found #1210 and #1214. Even more significant error by Walters, unless C&NW stuck a different model of switcher into the numbering sequence. The model is an SW1, #1210 and #1214 were SW1200s.
Once again the closest I could find.
Was pleasantly surprised to find an exact match for this one.
As close as I could get for this one.
Funny yet kind of frustrating how many RTR locomotives are not exact matches of a particular prototype; problem is worse for steam engines but it's there for diesels as well. Guess it's a boon for those who like to do a lot of extra painting and detailing, but I don't.




Looks like #6935 wasn't an OL engine, at least not when this picture was taken. Either it was repainted at another time or Athearn needs to put more time into prototype research.


Oops what happened to the C&NW logo on the nose?


Couldn't find #1212, found #1210 and #1214. Even more significant error by Walters, unless C&NW stuck a different model of switcher into the numbering sequence. The model is an SW1, #1210 and #1214 were SW1200s.



Once again the closest I could find.


Was pleasantly surprised to find an exact match for this one.


As close as I could get for this one.