Search results

Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top. The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech...

Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top. The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech...

Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top. The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech...

Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top. The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech...

Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top. The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech...

Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top. The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech...

Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top. The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech...

Small problem - the image isn't a Panzerjaeger I - it's a Sturmpanzer I. The Sturmpanzer was a device to carry an SiG-33 field gun around - all that was done was remove the fighting compartment of the Pz I put on a shield and park the field gun on top. The Panzerjaeger I used captured Czech...

The Halinski Panther kit is around 2000 parts - a lot of it is roadwheels and tracks. I think the Halinski Bergepanther and T-34/76 might well run to more parts. regards, Charlie

No it was a strictly WW2 development - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AEC_Armoured_Car The vehicle you are thinking of is the Saladin armoured car which shared a chassis and running gear with the Saracen APC. Regards, Charlie

I don't think there is a model of the AEC armoured car available. There was a limited number of these vehicles built (about 600). British WW2 armour models are very limited in number. It would be an interesting subject - an armoured car with similar weapons to tanks. Regards, Charlie

Ok - same deal - send me a PM with an e-mail address and I'll send it out as an e-mail attachment Regards, Charlie

Is this what you're looking for? Used to be a download from Smartgroups - the author never responded to e-mails so it didn't get rehosted. If it is the right ship PM me an e-mail and I'll send you a copy. Regards, Charlie

It sounds like one of those "get whacked around the head often enough by the instructor and you don't do it things..." A bit like not trying to turn back to the field if you lose engine power on climb out after takeoff. I write software to pay bills so nerdy is my usual state. Regards...

Ok - that sounds like an invitation to be nerdy to me.... How about a biography of the Ekranoplan inventor - Rostislav Evgenievich Alekseev - he actually was designer of Russian hydrofoils (they built thousands of them) before the Ekranoplans - http://www.foils.org/alekseev.htm And some...

Possibly an engine from a Soviet-era Ural motorcycle. The Ural was a 650cc engine copied/adapted from a pre-war German BMW engine. The power rating is about right for the Ural engine. Regards, Charlie

Thanks for the explanation. The Red army seems to have a black sense of humour about AFVs - I remember reading the T-60 light tank was called "a grave for 2 brothers". Regards, Charlie

I've got ask - why was the Hetzer (aka SdKfz 138/2) a "little dangerous coffin"? Regards, Charlie

www.hobbyfactory.com in the Digital Models section Regards, Charlie

I stayed with the French AFVs in my original comment but certainly the Japanese and early British AFVs have been sadly neglected. In my view it's quite astounding that there no models of the Universal Carrier in 1/25 - even though most of the Allied armies used them extensively in a multitude of...