Which Bridge?

Pitchwife

Dreamer
Apr 23, 2001
1,728
0
36
71
The middle of nowhere Oregon
Visit site
When you are crossing anything from a gully to a river, except for the length of the span, is there any rhyme or reason to determine which type of bridge to use as opposed to another? I know that there are a bunch of different types and figured there must be a reason to use one over another but so far I haven't figured out what they are. Ideas??:confused:

Clark
 

Clerk

Active Member
Nov 6, 2002
1,678
0
36
91
Esparto, California
Visit site
Hi Clark. I don't know what the system is for what type bridge, but for gullys and rivers I prefer trestles. Others will come on and give their views for different types of bridges and for what purpose.
 

Lighthorseman

Active Member
Jul 24, 2002
1,240
0
36
57
Out in the sticks
Visit site
Choosing Bridge Types...

Unless you're a prototype modeller who has to model specific bridges in specific locations, here is the way to choose.


"Hmmmm....Hey, that's a cool bridge. I'll put it, ummmmm, here.":D

That's what I do.:)
 

Ravensfan

New Member
Oct 16, 2002
58
0
6
60
planet earth
Visit site
Originally posted by N Gauger

... You buy or build something, you look around to see where it will be most pleasing to the eye. Then place it there & build around it. :) :)

Or, imagine your layout, in your mind or on paper, and go from there. In fact, that's what I'm doing right now. Imagination is a great tool.
 

RailRon

Active Member
Nov 23, 2002
1,602
0
36
80
Trimbach, Switzerland
Hi Clark,
if you really want to be prototypic, try to get Paul Mallery's "Bridge & Trestle Handbook" (Carstens Publications, $22.95 - but you might be lucky by finding a copy in a public library!). There you find about everything about every bridge type to every sort of landscape...
If you're freelancing, follow N Gauger's advice: Put the bridge you like most to where it shows to its best advantage :D

Happy bridging troubled waters!
Ron
 

N Gauger

1:20.3 Train Addict
Dec 20, 2000
6,732
0
36
South Eastern, PA
mywebpages.comcast.net
Originally posted by RailRon
Hi Clark,
if you really want to be prototypic, try to get Paul Mallery's "Bridge & Trestle Handbook" (Carstens Publications, $22.95 - but you might be lucky by finding a copy in a public library!). There you find about everything about every bridge type to every sort of landscape...
If you're freelancing, follow N Gauger's advice: Put the bridge you like most to where it shows to its best advantage :D

Happy bridging troubled waters!
Ron

Here's a link to Amazon.com :)

Bridge and Trestle Book :D :D :D
 

Pitchwife

Dreamer
Apr 23, 2001
1,728
0
36
71
The middle of nowhere Oregon
Visit site
Thanks for all of the advice. I'm not prototyping anything in particular, I just didn't want to have someone come up and tell me that no railroad designer in his right mind would put that type of bridge there. Still, there must be a reason for all the different types. Maybe something like load bearing or material cost. Otherwise a lot of engeneers would be out of business. :D
 

Paul Davis

New Member
there are a couple of things. Generally the more complex bridges like canteliver,arches, suspension will be used for long spans while plate girder etc will be used for shorter spans. Also generally through bridges are only used when clearance is a problem under the bridge.

Just use common sence. After all a 3ft long girder bridge (without any piers) would look flimsy and stupid but on the smae note a 6" suspension bridge would look out of place too.
 

chapmon

New Member
Dec 29, 2002
36
0
6
71
Longview, TX
Visit site
Bridge type

One of the things described in Mallery's Book, is an engineering principle called "Cooper Loading".

IN essence, the length, weight of average tonnage using the bridge, and the availability of material can dictate these design principles. It also might be determined by what it is you are spanning, i.e., roadway, creek, river, etc. A railroad also might determine that for a slow flowing creek, a culvert might do, in that when original surveys were done, the railroad always built with an eye towards cost. If a fancy bridge wasn't necessary, it didn't get built, and something cheaper may do until that design failed (flooding or other disaster).

The books go into that in detail.

There is also a book available on American Railway Bridges (I don't remember the publisher).

chapmon:) :)