What do you like best

Discussion in 'FAQs' started by shamus, Jun 23, 2002.

?

What shall we do?

Poll closed Jan 12, 2003.
  1. Magic Photo using your Computer

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Prototype Photo (Your own)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Straight Model Photo of Layout/Structure

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Scratchbuilding Whatever

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. spitfire

    spitfire Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oh yeah! A little too much fun!:D :D :D :D :D

    :D Val
  2. Gary Pfeil

    Gary Pfeil Active Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2001
    Messages:
    2,593
    Likes Received:
    0
    Both, without a doubt for me. Every railroad I've built has had provision for continuous run. As others have stated, sometimes you just want to see a train running without having to "operate" it. But watching a train run around in circles, even large ones which twist all around, gets boring real quick if that's all there is. I've been fortunate to have a fair amount of space available for my layouts, the smallest was 5 x 14. On that one, only the run along the front 14' length was visable, both turnback curves and several staging tracks along the back were hidden. A turnout from that front track climbed a grade to the rest of the llayout, above and behind that lower main. Whenever I was in the basement, a train was running on that bottom loop, even if I was just going by for tools for some project I was doing elsewhere. But when I operated, I ran the rest of the layout. My currant layout is two levels, with the bottom being continuous run (but when "operated" it functions point to point) and the upper level point to loop. I had thought about posting my track diagrams in the trackplanning section along with my reasoning for doing things the way I did, but wasn't sure anyone would be interested. It would get rather long, like this post! If anyone would like to see it, let me know.

    Gary
  3. jon-monon

    jon-monon Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    4,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    Val, I think if you look at your deep ionner self, you will realize, you too are a looper:


    Go ahead, tack on some wood and close the loop...
    :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
  4. jon-monon

    jon-monon Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    4,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    One o fmy recent track plans has one track running off to the back of a workbench. The idea is to send a loco off from the bench after working on it or the car it's pulling. Kind of eliminates need for a test track too :D
  5. Matthyro

    Matthyro Will always be re-membered

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2000
    Messages:
    4,767
    Likes Received:
    0
    You have devolped an interesting concept Gary. Yes please, we would like to see the track plan when you get around to posting it.
  6. jon-monon

    jon-monon Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    4,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not sure you wanted to see mine, but I'll post mine on the track plans forum rat now!

    Oops, I was thinking of Steve's built in bench idea. I'll post it anyway, since I've already converted it and transferred the file...
  7. spitfire

    spitfire Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jon - isn't that supposed to be spelled "raht nayow"?

    ;) Val
  8. jon-monon

    jon-monon Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    4,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    We like to keep it less formal :D :D :D Or if real excited, Rhat Neeeeeeow!
  9. HopefulAlan

    HopefulAlan New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2002
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gary, I'm with the rest of 'em - post that track plan, please.

    As those of you who have waded through my verbose, wordy, and otherwise lengthy posts on the Track Planning forum already know, I favor point-point if space permits. However, I see a real need for having some provision for running it continuously on some occasions.

    So, I guess I have become a combo guy.
  10. clumber

    clumber New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have a combination of both, it allows me to run my local freight round and round whilst the other services go out and back (and also turn the cassettes).
    Brian
  11. sumpter250

    sumpter250 multiscale modelbuilder

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2002
    Messages:
    3,217
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gary,
    Your layout was fun to operate on, I don't see any reason for not posting the plan.
    Pete.