Starship Troopers 3

Discussion in 'Internet Finds' started by cdavenport, Jun 27, 2008.

  1. cdavenport

    cdavenport Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    651
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. Stev0

    Stev0 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,170
    Likes Received:
    0
    Neat... Just that they should not call it Starship Troopers 3 but Starship Troopers : "movie title".

    The 2nd one was soooooo bad I just stopped watching it. bleh!
  3. jaffro

    jaffro Long term member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Messages:
    735
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you lasted longer than about 7 minutes you have a higher tolerance for cr@p than I do... :D
  4. Nothing

    Nothing Longtime Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,992
    Likes Received:
    2
    never knew there wasa a sequal.
  5. cdavenport

    cdavenport Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    651
    Likes Received:
    0
    The first movie, by itself, was lots of fun as long as you did not associate it too closely with Robert Heinlein. I am a Heinlein fan and I just watched the movie for the fun.

    But, Jaffro, et al are correct, the direct-to-DVD sequel was a waste of effort, gas to pick it up, and money. Unless Blockbuster delivers the 2nd direct-to-DVD sequel free of charge, I'm not going to take a chance.
  6. B-Manic

    B-Manic Peripheral Visionary

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    531
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nice bot
  7. Stev0

    Stev0 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,170
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree that the 1st movie for a 'fun watch' was just that. Verhoeven's work is questionable at the best of times but at least he isn't a Uwe Boll.

    Holy crap that guy needs to find another career.

    I'm wondering if the inclusion of the suits will push the movie more towards the books?