SA-43 Hammerhead Fighter

Discussion in 'Dream Kits & Wish Lists' started by Rhaven Blaack, Oct 31, 2016.

  1. Revell-Fan

    Revell-Fan Co-Administrator Administrator Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2009
    Messages:
    6,421
    Likes Received:
    3,957
    I have just checked the proportions of the model. They are wrong. :(

    This is a quick overlay of orthographic renderings of the original CG model:

    SA43-10Hammerhead2.jpg

    You can clearly see that the outlines do not match.

    You should not start unfolding before making some changes to the mesh.

    Source of the original renderings:
    http://www.modelermagic.com/?p=741
  2. zathros

    zathros -----SENIOR---- Administrator Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2013
    Messages:
    8,047
    Likes Received:
    3,838
    Yup, this happens all the time. You can get away with it on fictional stuff though , and it would be a cool model nonetheless, many would build it too, as there is nothing else, but for reality based models, no way. Valiant effort though. :)
    Rhaven Blaack likes this.
  3. Sky Seeker

    Sky Seeker Well Established Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2015
    Messages:
    716
    Likes Received:
    500
    This design looks sharp!:) I'll be happy to do a test build of it, after the Vorchan is done of course!

    Sky Seeker
    :tank:
    Gandolf50 and zathros like this.
  4. Gandolf50

    Gandolf50 Researcher of obscure between war vehicles... Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2013
    Messages:
    465
    Likes Received:
    478
    It is not the same model! Just a variation that is buildable with ( cockpit in the works ... DROP-IN as in the TV show) and fold up workable landing gear and such! This one is buildable!

    You are comparing to this one...SAAB Wildcard version...
    SAABWildcard.jpg it is still off a slight bit. SAABWildcard2.jpg as the intakes are not slanted as far as the original, and the fuselage is a bit narrow but matches your comparison fairly well. Trouble with the real version ( I know we want the REAL DEAL) it is UGLY! and almost impossible to make buildable. Was looking at references and these lines are Nasty for paper! WildcardsClip7.jpg WildcardsClip6.jpg and the landing gear! acckkk!! hammer03.jpg That rear gear will NEVER WORK!
    Got some of the original concept sketches...and the mesh in the TV show is fairly close.. but not the TV full scale version ..they goofed on a lot of things..

    Space-Above-and-Beyond-Hammerhead-Art-3.jpg ... Hard to tell but in this screen grab looks like the intake is flattened more like my version WildcardsClip2.jpg ... this screen grab view shows the curves of the rear sections that will play hell with a paper version... WildcardsClip5.jpg

    So all and all I'll chalk this one up to an exercise and file it away to the Maybe Someday If I GET AROUND TO IT FOLDER...
    Sky Seeker and Rhaven Blaack like this.
  5. Revell-Fan

    Revell-Fan Co-Administrator Administrator Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2009
    Messages:
    6,421
    Likes Received:
    3,957
    Ahh, I see! Now I got it!

    I agree about the ... (cough) "landing gear" (cough) on the mockup. It looks like a pair of tooth picks... :lolsign:
    Gandolf50 likes this.
  6. zathros

    zathros -----SENIOR---- Administrator Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2013
    Messages:
    8,047
    Likes Received:
    3,838
    Worse than the Boeing B-17's!!! :)
  7. Gandolf50

    Gandolf50 Researcher of obscure between war vehicles... Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2013
    Messages:
    465
    Likes Received:
    478
    Yep.. just for show...actually...not for show...just to haul the thing around from location to location...as these things would never fold up into the craft...it would be a physical impossibility.

    Well at least the B17 would fold up...
    B17_Av_4501_DA_main-gear_p142_W.png
    but most of the time when landing the plane....
    b-17-thumper-belly-landing.jpg lots of belly flops.

    Hey...doesn't the hammerhead remind you of the SR-71B Blackbird in away?
    Sky Seeker, zathros and Ron Caudillo like this.
  8. Revell-Fan

    Revell-Fan Co-Administrator Administrator Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2009
    Messages:
    6,421
    Likes Received:
    3,957
    Sky Seeker, zathros and Rhaven Blaack like this.
  9. zathros

    zathros -----SENIOR---- Administrator Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2013
    Messages:
    8,047
    Likes Received:
    3,838
    I think even a bad model of the Hammerhead would be widely accepted. Make one wheels up to avoid that hassles. People would eat this up.
    Sky Seeker and Ron Caudillo like this.
  10. Revell-Fan

    Revell-Fan Co-Administrator Administrator Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2009
    Messages:
    6,421
    Likes Received:
    3,957
    I don't think so. If you make a model, just do it "right". Not "bad". I would consider a "bad" model having lots of intersections, parts which are unfolded in a way that you may break your fingers during assembly and which is too simplified (e. g. edgy and flat). This one looks like a fairly good interpretation of the subject. ;)
  11. Rhaven Blaack

    Rhaven Blaack ADMINISTRATOR Administrator Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Messages:
    7,656
    Likes Received:
    2,619
    I have to say that this one looks better than the ones that are available. If someone is willing to unfold it, I would be willing to do the test build.
  12. Ron Caudillo

    Ron Caudillo Creative Advisory Consultant Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    275
    I wouldn't consider it "bad". My models tend to be "close enough", can never get it 100% due to the limitations of paper anyway. I for one, have always wanted one!

    Ron Caudillo
    Rhaven Blaack and Revell-Fan like this.
  13. Revell-Fan

    Revell-Fan Co-Administrator Administrator Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2009
    Messages:
    6,421
    Likes Received:
    3,957
  14. zathros

    zathros -----SENIOR---- Administrator Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2013
    Messages:
    8,047
    Likes Received:
    3,838
    This is true, with using water forming techniques I described a long time ago, many limitations can be overcome. You must have a printer that uses Pigment Ink only, or be willing to pain the part by hand. Dan B King used water forming on his Discovery model, and the front is a multi-compound curves, the makes the ship prop worthy for any movie. :)
    Sky Seeker likes this.
  15. Gandolf50

    Gandolf50 Researcher of obscure between war vehicles... Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2013
    Messages:
    465
    Likes Received:
    478
    Left lots of "Room" for greebles as well as advanced or basic...like include the landing gear or not.. open or closed.. cockpit or not ( not created yet BTW ) or at least.. not fitted as a drop in unit. lots of fiddly bits.. that need attention to check fit and workability...

    Hammer-L-gear.jpg Landing gear with doors removed and open interior shows all the available space to fold them up...( got the interior surround but removed to show space)..

    only areas that will be problems are the intakes and the nose... but the nose is broken down to basic elements so won't be that difficult...