# im starting a new layoutand i have a ?

Discussion in 'N / Z Scale Model Trains' started by ozzy, Apr 16, 2007.

1. ### ozzyActive Member

Joined:
Jun 25, 2006
Messages:
594
0
this time i want it to be more to scale., so i need to know how far apart mainline track should be in scale feet and/or inches?

Joined:
Apr 30, 2005
Messages:
410
0
3. ### ozzyActive Member

Joined:
Jun 25, 2006
Messages:
594
0
i guess that would help if i knew what it all meant.
4. ### CannonballMore Trains Than Brains

Joined:
Dec 4, 2006
Messages:
1,592
0
I have yet to figure out why the NMRA has to take everything and turn it into a quantum physics worksheet.
5. ### baldwinjlMember

Joined:
Apr 30, 2005
Messages:
410
0
It really isn't that hard. At he top of the page they define what they mean by Class II, Class I, and Class IA. Then they have a separate chart for each scale. The for various radiuses they show center to center spacing for each class. If you want the safe, easy answer, just use the widest spacing they show. Otherwise, use what fits your situation. What they are trying to show is that larger equipment needs more space on sharper curves. Also, in the M* column, they are trying to say that in a yard, you might need to get your fingers in between cars.

Jeff
6. ### CannonballMore Trains Than Brains

Joined:
Dec 4, 2006
Messages:
1,592
0
So to be safe, go with 1-13/32" - right?
7. ### baldwinjlMember

Joined:
Apr 30, 2005
Messages:
410
0
Yep. You could even go to 1-1/2 to make is easy, if that's what you wanted to do. On the other hand, on a double main line, going down to 1-1/16 might look really good on the straights. You just need to make sure you give yourself some room going in to the curves. Experiment a bit, see what looks good. Then make sure you've got more than the minimum to avoid getting suprised when two trains with long overhang cars meet!

Jeff
8. ### bigsteelCall me Mr.Tinkertrain

Joined:
Dec 12, 2006
Messages:
1,353
0
i dont know if this helps but i run big C&O articulateds down to small geeps and use 1 1/2in for straights and 2in for curves and i have a minimum radii of 22in.hope this helps.if it dont....oh well i tried.--josh

EDITooops this is N scale not HO.well we all make mistakes
9. ### TorpedoMember

Joined:
Jan 20, 2007
Messages:
299
0
13' 0" on centerlines for tangent (straight) track was a common prototype standard. That's only 0.975 inches in N scale.

It's awful tight for five fingered switching, though.
10. ### CannonballMore Trains Than Brains

Joined:
Dec 4, 2006
Messages:
1,592
0
Lets just go 1 inch then.
11. ### eightyeightfan1Now I'm AMP'd

Joined:
Jun 18, 2002
Messages:
2,809
0
Might want to take that in consideration(NMRA standard does this I think), for re-railing an errant piece of rolling stock.
12. ### TorpedoMember

Joined:
Jan 20, 2007
Messages:
299
0
The man said he wanted to be more scale. He didn't say anything about not wanting the difficulties exact scale brings to the tiNy gauge. sign1sign1sign1
13. ### ozzyActive Member

Joined:
Jun 25, 2006
Messages:
594
0
MY trains dont derail!!!!!!!!!! im a better engineer then that.....lmao

all i wanted to know was for a double mainline. i already know what im spacing the yard at to make it easier..

14. ### ozzyActive Member

Joined:
Jun 25, 2006
Messages:
594
0
i think i will go with 1 1/2" just to be safe.
15. ### baldwinjlMember

Joined:
Apr 30, 2005
Messages:
410
0
Also, on any curve at all our cars have more overhhang than the real thing, since our curves are so tight (even broad ones). Going less that the NRMA recommendations is asking for trouble, I think. What is prototype varies alot by time and location. Thirteen feet would be the short side. Fifteen feet, or even more, is more likely these days, from what I have read.

Jeff

Joined:
Jan 20, 2007
Messages:
299