Cotton Belt FTs - in combination?

Triplex

Active Member
Aug 24, 2005
1,719
0
36
38
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
You can never assume that an old diesel got standard MU on both ends. Early Alcos and FMs couldn't MU with EMDs, and many switchers had no MU at all. These deficiencies were not always corrected. VIA Rail had E-units without nose MU until the late 70s.

That link says that the FTBs were eventually separated from the FTAs.
 

wjstix

Member
Nov 18, 2004
212
0
16
65
FT's were designed by EMC/EMD to come in A/B sets with a drawbar between the two units - it was considered one two-section engine, kinda the diesel equivalent of a Mallet. Originally, there wasn't even a door that you could close between the two units, just the walkway and diaphragms. So FT's were run A-B or A-B+B-A. Later separate FT B units were made without the rear overhang (FTSB's - FT short B's) that could have drawbars connecting them A-B-A.

Santa Fe IIRC wanted to be able to separate the B units and worked out a way to add couplers, other railroads also modified them, I can't recall if GM/EMD offered it as an option or not...by that time they were already working to replace it with the F2 whose were designed to be able to take either a coupler or drawbar.