AXM STS rocket

zathros

*****SENIOR ADMINISTRATOR*****
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Apr 5, 2013
13,499
9,551
228
Those LaGrange points aren't doing a damned thing and need to be "occupied", and it should be "U.S.", and the others who wish to share, that way we can keep them open to all the civilized people, (whatever that means). :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: AXM61

ViperPilot

New Member
Aug 21, 2016
42
35
0
61
zathros,

+1 to that. My 'creation' plans to take advantage of that idea, and Alfonso's Models fit the bill perfectly. Cygnus, ATV/MTV, Dragon 1 & 2, ISS, MIR... there's a Model for everything I'm formulating in the ol' brain.

(another plea for the CST-100... hint hint) :sticktongue:

Alan
nasa_orion_program_icon_square_sticker_3_x_3_zpsh75fuqko.jpg


EDIT: A tech question... would RTG's be feasible (or for that matter, reasonable/practical) for a deep space journey to Mars/ L1/L2 instead of using Solar/Thermal Panels for electrical generation?
Hmmm...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AXM61

zathros

*****SENIOR ADMINISTRATOR*****
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Apr 5, 2013
13,499
9,551
228
RTG's give a lot of energy over a long period, but not a lot of electricity, and the amount needed in the Kilo-Watt range, would require some kind of fission reactor, albeit, not a huge one. Once someone brings one into space, then others will start, and the nuclear-ization of space will begin. It does seem the only option though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AXM61

ViperPilot

New Member
Aug 21, 2016
42
35
0
61
Many thanks for the insights, zathros!

I wasn't aware that RTG's are lacking in the higher Electrical ranges; guess I'll stick with the old 'tried and true' method... Solar/Thermal Panels it is, then!

Alan
latest
 

zathros

*****SENIOR ADMINISTRATOR*****
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Apr 5, 2013
13,499
9,551
228
I think it will be Fission reactors. They can be disposed of easily once in space, just shoot it towards the Sun. It the launch that's the scary part.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AXM61