I have found the same data but:
a)The OP has not stated how he intends to utilize the data.
b) With the data readily available, and reading the threads on both forums, I don't see how, with all the data recovered, why no virtual model has been drawn up. I could loft the Hull with the hull former lines, and deduce the station points, but this is not a model I am interested in building.
c) I have asked, twice, what kind of software, or method was going to be used to do this. If it was string and ruler, because that was the OP had, well, that's actually a fine way to loft a Hull, and I might be compelled to do it. Without the proper software, I would have to make the hull formers, flatten the skins, decide on whether this is a waterline, or full hull model, and again, we've supplied the data, but no response on the scale, or methodology that is going to be used. I would in essence be the person making this model. What is exactly being asked of us?
I think this is pipe dreaming. The OP(Original Poster) would be better going out and getting the Revelle model, detail the superstructure in paper, and make a multi media model of this ship, that for the many many hours it would take to put into paper, few would build. I'll help anyone make their model, but I'm not making models for anyone. I've lofted hulls for quite a few people, but nothing came of those models, and to be honest, after the few hours it took to make, then flatten, it has left a bad taste.
If I don't hear a post the the Original Poster soon on this, I will close this thread. Please, until a response is made to all the info given, and a response to the questions posed, nobody post any more.
This is looking like a waste of time and resources, when all that is needed is some Googling. I found everything you posted in 15 minutes, and I wasn't trying very hard, and have very slow, in the woods, internet speed. Again, what is really being asked of us?
