Designing the Su-7, Su-9, Su-17, Su-22 and MiG-21
- Thread starter Paragon
- Start date
- Status
Cross sections for the P.1112 joints? I'm afraid you'll have to give me a little example of what you're talking about here. I'm also afraid that doing this will be somewhat difficult, my design process is quite unorthadox, and does not produce cross sections (like using a 3D modelling program would). Give me some examples, and some time, and I'm sure I could come up with something. Though for what it's worth, the cross-section for the fuselage should pretty much be circles of varying diameter throughout the model.
Ok, well I'm glad it will help. I hope its of high enough resolution that it scales up well.
Also, I doubt those intakes would have actually worked, it doesn't look like the air would actually get into them.
Also, I doubt those intakes would have actually worked, it doesn't look like the air would actually get into them.
Holy crap, a cargo plane that can do barrel rolls and loops!? The Beriev also look very interesting, I wouldn't mind doing either of them. Anyone else have a preference?
Thank you for that J-10 Paragon!!!!!! It rocks! --Would you mind if I put those files up for download on Chinese forums? Or you prefer having a link to your site only?
Either really, its up to you. I like knowing how many times a file gets downloaded, it helps me figure out what subjects are most popular, and design models that more people will enjoy, so linking them to the site would be slightly preferable. I do have Google translator on the homepage, which includes Chinese. You could also link them to each of the models on the savefile site, if you want to point them directly to that particular content.
Ok, that makes two for the Spartan, so right now it looks pretty likely to be next. Any more input?
Thanks Paragon, no I was just wondering if your site is accessible from China (great firewall creeps into mind)... Also I'm interested about that "detailed model" of the J-10 on your site, do you have a link for it? (the current one isn't right...)
other options
I think the family Mirage III/V/50/Kfir/Pantera/Cheetah/etc would have and enormous potencial for color schemes and variations with and without dog teeth, canards, noses and bi-places. It has been smehow overlooked by paper modellers, and only a very early Mirage IIIC version is available from Maly Modelarz, not very accurate. It is very close to my heart as has been the mainstay of my beloved Colombian Air Force since 1972 (Mirage V and Kfir).
I have some good high resolution drawings, but my skills are no way close to "Master Paragon".
I will vote also for the A-37 and the Beriev
I have several views of the last UAV from China, which I will post next
I think the family Mirage III/V/50/Kfir/Pantera/Cheetah/etc would have and enormous potencial for color schemes and variations with and without dog teeth, canards, noses and bi-places. It has been smehow overlooked by paper modellers, and only a very early Mirage IIIC version is available from Maly Modelarz, not very accurate. It is very close to my heart as has been the mainstay of my beloved Colombian Air Force since 1972 (Mirage V and Kfir).
I have some good high resolution drawings, but my skills are no way close to "Master Paragon".
I will vote also for the A-37 and the Beriev
I have several views of the last UAV from China, which I will post next
Holy Cow...It wasn't Chinese but Russian MiG!!!
Sorry about the confussion.
This is the last MiG workshops outcome: Unmanned Combat Aircraft to oppose to the Global Hawk and the other likes from USA.
The MiG Skat UCAV:
Sorry about the confussion.
This is the last MiG workshops outcome: Unmanned Combat Aircraft to oppose to the Global Hawk and the other likes from USA.
The MiG Skat UCAV:
I've actually seen that before. While it does look pretty interesting, I have to say I'm a bit disappointed with the shift toward remote aircraft, and not as big a fan of them as those with cockpits.
- Status